Al Nahdha vs Al-Wajj: result 3-1 and analysis
Division 1Regular Season - 27Kick-off on April 14, 2017 at 03:25 PM (UTC)Prince Fahad bin Salman Stadium (Al Nahda), Dammam
Full time
What was the result of Al Nahdha vs Al-Wajj?
Al Nahdha won 3-1 on April 14, 2017.
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Al Nahdha have 3 wins, 6 draws and 6 defeats; Al-Wajj have 5, 4 and 6.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2017 | Al Orubah(home) | 0-0 | Division 1 |
| Mar 31, 2017 | Damac(away) | 0-1 | Division 1 |
| Mar 17, 2017 | Al Jeel(home) | 0-0 | Division 1 |
| Mar 11, 2017 | Al Shoalah(away) | 0-0 | Division 1 |
| Mar 3, 2017 | Al Taee(home) | 0-3 | Division 1 |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2017 | Al-Watani(home) | 3-0 | Division 1 |
| Apr 2, 2017 | Al-Ahli Jeddah(away) | 0-6 | King's Cup |
| Mar 24, 2017 | Al Orubah(away) | 2-2 | Division 1 |
| Mar 18, 2017 | Al Najoom(home) | 2-2 | Division 1 |
| Mar 10, 2017 | Damac(away) | 1-1 | Division 1 |
What does the head-to-head say?
Across the last 1 meetings: 1 Al Nahdha win(s), 0 draw(s), 0 Al-Wajj win(s).
| Date | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2016 | Al-Wajj 1-2 Al Nahdha | Division 1 |
How many goals should we expect?
Al Nahdha score 0.7 and concede 1.2 goals per match over their last 15; Al-Wajj score 1.4 and concede 1.9.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al Nahdha | 0.7 | 1.2 | 5 | 5/15 | 5/15 |
| Al-Wajj | 1.4 | 1.9 | 4 | 8/15 | 11/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy