Al-Wajj vs Al Qaisoma: result 1-2 and analysis
Division 1Regular Season - 20Kick-off on February 9, 2017 at 01:10 PM (UTC)King Fahd Sport City Stadium, Ta'if
Full time
What was the result of Al-Wajj vs Al Qaisoma?
Al Qaisoma won 1-2 on February 9, 2017.
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Al-Wajj have 5 wins, 5 draws and 5 defeats; Al Qaisoma have 5, 2 and 8.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2017 | Al Shoalah(away) | 0-4 | Division 1 |
| Jan 28, 2017 | Al-Adalah(home) | 1-1 | Division 1 |
| Jan 19, 2017 | Al Shabab(home) | 1-0 | King's Cup |
| Jan 6, 2017 | Al Taee(home) | 3-0 | Division 1 |
| Dec 29, 2016 | Najran(away) | 1-0 | Division 1 |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2017 | Al-Adalah(home) | 4-2 | Division 1 |
| Jan 28, 2017 | Najran(away) | 1-3 | Division 1 |
| Jan 18, 2017 | Al-Hilal Saudi FC(away) | 1-2 | King's Cup |
| Jan 6, 2017 | Hajer(home) | 2-3 | Division 1 |
| Dec 30, 2016 | Al Nahdha(away) | 3-2 | Division 1 |
What does the head-to-head say?
Across the last 1 meetings: 0 Al-Wajj win(s), 1 draw(s), 0 Al Qaisoma win(s).
| Date | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2016 | Al Qaisoma 1-1 Al-Wajj | Division 1 |
How many goals should we expect?
Al-Wajj score 1.1 and concede 1.3 goals per match over their last 15; Al Qaisoma score 1.4 and concede 1.7.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al-Wajj | 1.1 | 1.3 | 5 | 7/15 | 7/15 |
| Al Qaisoma | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1 | 9/15 | 8/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy