BCGS Hong Kong Sapling vs Wong Tai Sin: result 9-3 and analysis
HKFA 1st DivisionRegular Season - 9Kick-off on November 3, 2019 at 07:30 AM (UTC)Tsing Yi Sports Ground, Tsing Yi
Full time
What was the result of BCGS Hong Kong Sapling vs Wong Tai Sin?
BCGS Hong Kong Sapling won 9-3 on November 3, 2019.
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, BCGS Hong Kong Sapling have 3 wins, 2 draws and 10 defeats; Wong Tai Sin have 5, 4 and 6.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2019 | Rangers(home) | 3-0 | HKFA 1st Division |
| Oct 20, 2019 | Wing Yee(away) | 6-3 | HKFA 1st Division |
| Sep 22, 2019 | Resources Capital(away) | 2-3 | HKFA 1st Division |
| Sep 15, 2019 | Citizen AA(away) | 2-3 | HKFA 1st Division |
| Sep 8, 2019 | Eastern District(home) | 1-5 | HKFA 1st Division |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2019 | Eastern District(away) | 3-3 | HKFA 1st Division |
| Oct 20, 2019 | Citizen AA(home) | 2-4 | HKFA 1st Division |
| Sep 29, 2019 | Wing Yee(home) | 0-0 | HKFA 1st Division |
| Sep 22, 2019 | Hoi King(away) | 1-1 | HKFA 1st Division |
| Sep 15, 2019 | Shatin(away) | 3-2 | HKFA 1st Division |
How many goals should we expect?
BCGS Hong Kong Sapling score 1.9 and concede 2.9 goals per match over their last 15; Wong Tai Sin score 1.4 and concede 2.3.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCGS Hong Kong Sapling | 1.9 | 2.9 | 2 | 11/15 | 14/15 |
| Wong Tai Sin | 1.4 | 2.3 | 3 | 9/15 | 11/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy