Braintree vs Dagenham & Redbridge: result 3-2 and analysis
National LeagueRegular Season - 32Kick-off on December 26, 2016 at 03:00 PM (UTC)Cressing Road Stadium, Braintree, Essex
Full time
What was the result of Braintree vs Dagenham & Redbridge?
Braintree won 3-2 on December 26, 2016.
Goalscorers
- 32′O. HawkinsDagenham & Redbridge
- 35′M. CheekBraintree
- 45′S. AkinolaBraintree (pen.)
- 47′J. Maguire-DrewDagenham & Redbridge
- 64′S. AkinolaBraintree
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Braintree have 6 wins, 3 draws and 6 defeats; Dagenham & Redbridge have 5, 4 and 6.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2016 | Boreham Wood(away) | 1-0 | National League |
| Dec 17, 2016 | Gateshead(away) | 1-1 | National League |
| Dec 10, 2016 | Torquay(home) | 2-0 | FA Trophy |
| Dec 4, 2016 | Millwall(away) | 2-5 | FA Cup |
| Nov 26, 2016 | Southport(away) | 5-4 | National League |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2016 | Solihull Moors(home) | 4-4 | National League |
| Dec 10, 2016 | Worthing(home) | 1-2 | FA Trophy |
| Dec 3, 2016 | Dover(away) | 2-1 | National League |
| Nov 29, 2016 | Torquay(home) | 0-1 | National League |
| Nov 26, 2016 | Barrow(home) | 1-4 | National League |
How many goals should we expect?
Braintree score 1.8 and concede 1.9 goals per match over their last 15; Dagenham & Redbridge score 1.1 and concede 1.5.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braintree | 1.8 | 1.9 | 4 | 8/15 | 8/15 |
| Dagenham & Redbridge | 1.1 | 1.5 | 5 | 7/15 | 6/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | Braintree | 46 | 8 | 12 | 26 | 38 | 76 | 36 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy