Criciuma vs CSA: result 1-3 and analysis
Serie BRegular Season - 4Kick-off on May 1, 2018 at 07:00 PM (UTC)Estádio Heriberto Hülse, Criciúma, Santa Catarina
Full time
What was the result of Criciuma vs CSA?
CSA won 1-3 on May 1, 2018.
Goalscorers
- 32′DidiraCSA
- 52′João PauloCriciuma (pen.)
- 59′NinoCSA (o.g.)
- 83′DidiraCSA
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Criciuma have 1 wins, 5 draws and 9 defeats; CSA have 8, 2 and 5.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2018 | Coritiba(away) | 1-2 | Serie B |
| Apr 21, 2018 | Ponte Preta(home) | 0-1 | Serie B |
| Apr 13, 2018 | Atletico Goianiense(away) | 2-3 | Serie B |
| Feb 21, 2018 | Cianorte(home) | 1-1 | Copa Do Brasil |
| Feb 7, 2018 | São Caetano(away) | 1-1 | Copa Do Brasil |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2018 | Oeste(home) | 5-1 | Serie B |
| Apr 20, 2018 | Sao Bento(away) | 1-2 | Serie B |
| Apr 14, 2018 | Goias(home) | 2-1 | Serie B |
| Apr 8, 2018 | CRB(away) | 2-0 | Alagoano |
| Apr 1, 2018 | CRB(home) | 0-1 | Alagoano |
How many goals should we expect?
Criciuma score 1.0 and concede 1.5 goals per match over their last 15; CSA score 1.6 and concede 0.9.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criciuma | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2 | 10/15 | 6/15 |
| CSA | 1.6 | 0.9 | 5 | 6/15 | 7/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Criciuma | 24 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 25 | 17 | 44 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy