Garliava vs Transinvest 2: result 3-0 and analysis
1 LygaRegular Season - 14Kick-off on June 19, 2026 at 04:30 PM (UTC)Garliavos Adomo Mitkaus mokyklos stadionas, Garliava
Full time
What was the result of Garliava vs Transinvest 2?
Garliava won 3-0 on June 19, 2026.
Goalscorers
- 17′Ernestas ZdanovicGarliava
- 62′Tomas RakasiusGarliava
- 72′J. PastukasGarliava
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Garliava have 6 wins, 4 draws and 5 defeats; Transinvest 2 have 4, 2 and 7.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2026 | Žalgiris II(away) | 1-2 | 1 Lyga |
| Jun 8, 2026 | Dainava(away) | 0-1 | 1 Lyga |
| May 29, 2026 | FA Šiauliai II(home) | 1-1 | 1 Lyga |
| May 23, 2026 | Atmosfera(away) | 1-1 | 1 Lyga |
| May 19, 2026 | BFA(away) | 1-2 | Cup |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2026 | FA Šiauliai II(away) | 2-1 | 1 Lyga |
| Jun 10, 2026 | Neptūną Klaipėda(away) | 0-3 | 1 Lyga |
| May 30, 2026 | Kauno Žalgiris II(home) | 0-1 | 1 Lyga |
| May 22, 2026 | Ekranas(away) | 0-4 | 1 Lyga |
| May 15, 2026 | Be1 NFA(home) | 0-2 | 1 Lyga |
How many goals should we expect?
Garliava score 1.6 and concede 1.0 goals per match over their last 15; Transinvest 2 score 1.0 and concede 2.5.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garliava | 1.6 | 1.0 | 4 | 8/15 | 9/15 |
| Transinvest 2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 1 | 6/13 | 10/13 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
Garliava sit 11th in 1 Lyga (22 points from 20 matches) and Transinvest 2 sit 13th (18 points from 20 matches).
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Garliava | 20 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 23 | 22 | 22 |
| 13 | Transinvest 2 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 20 | 46 | 18 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy