Ljungskile SK vs IK Frej: result 2-2 and analysis
SuperettanRegular Season - 7Kick-off on May 11, 2016 at 05:00 PM (UTC)Uddevalla Arena, Ljungskile
Full time
What was the result of Ljungskile SK vs IK Frej?
Ljungskile SK and IK Frej drew 2-2 on May 11, 2016.
Goalscorers
- 7′Joakim RunnemoIK Frej
- 29′A. BajrovicLjungskile SK
- 70′Oke AkpovetaIK Frej (pen.)
- 86′Hannes StillerLjungskile SK
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 6 matches in all competitions, Ljungskile SK have 2 wins, 2 draws and 2 defeats; IK Frej have 1, 3 and 2.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2016 | Syrianska FC(away) | 0-1 | Superettan |
| May 1, 2016 | Dalkurd FF(home) | 1-0 | Superettan |
| Apr 23, 2016 | AFC Eskilstuna(away) | 0-1 | Superettan |
| Apr 17, 2016 | Atvidabergs FF(home) | 2-2 | Superettan |
| Apr 10, 2016 | IFK Varnamo(away) | 2-0 | Superettan |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2016 | Sirius(home) | 2-2 | Superettan |
| Apr 30, 2016 | Varbergs BoIS FC(away) | 2-2 | Superettan |
| Apr 23, 2016 | Angelholms FF(home) | 1-2 | Superettan |
| Apr 16, 2016 | Degerfors IF(away) | 2-2 | Superettan |
| Apr 9, 2016 | Assyriska FF(home) | 2-1 | Superettan |
How many goals should we expect?
Ljungskile SK score 1.0 and concede 0.8 goals per match over their last 6; IK Frej score 1.5 and concede 1.8.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ljungskile SK | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2 | 2/6 | 1/6 |
| IK Frej | 1.5 | 1.8 | 0 | 5/6 | 5/6 |
Over the last 6 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Ljungskile SK | 19 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 27 | 27 | 23 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy