PEPO vs JäPS: result 0-1 and analysis
Kakkonen - Lohko ARegular Season - 8Kick-off on June 19, 2016 at 03:30 PM (UTC)Kimpisen Urheilupuisto, Lappeenranta
Full time
What was the result of PEPO vs JäPS?
JäPS won 0-1 on June 19, 2016.
Goalscorers
- 73′Ville JauhiainenJäPS
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 10 matches in all competitions, PEPO have 3 wins, 0 draws and 7 defeats; JäPS have 4, 6 and 5.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2016 | Gnistan(away) | 0-1 | Kakkonen - Lohko A |
| Jun 2, 2016 | MP(home) | 1-2 | Kakkonen - Lohko A |
| May 28, 2016 | Vaajakoski(away) | 1-2 | Kakkonen - Lohko A |
| May 24, 2016 | Kultsu(home) | 2-1 | Kakkonen - Lohko A |
| May 14, 2016 | Sudet(away) | 1-2 | Kakkonen - Lohko A |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2016 | KuFu-98(home) | 2-3 | Kakkonen - Lohko A |
| Jun 2, 2016 | MPS(away) | 1-1 | Kakkonen - Lohko A |
| May 27, 2016 | Gnistan(away) | 1-2 | Kakkonen - Lohko A |
| May 21, 2016 | MP(home) | 1-1 | Kakkonen - Lohko A |
| May 14, 2016 | Vaajakoski(away) | 1-1 | Kakkonen - Lohko A |
How many goals should we expect?
PEPO score 1.4 and concede 2.2 goals per match over their last 10; JäPS score 1.4 and concede 1.5.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEPO | 1.4 | 2.2 | 0 | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| JäPS | 1.4 | 1.5 | 4 | 9/15 | 8/15 |
Over the last 10 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | PEPO | 18 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 36 | 23 | 37 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy