Rakvere Tarvas vs FCI Levadia II: result 2-1 and analysis
Esiliiga ARegular SeasonKick-off on April 11, 2012 at 03:45 PM (UTC)Rakvere linnastaadion, Rakvere
Full time
What was the result of Rakvere Tarvas vs FCI Levadia II?
Rakvere Tarvas won 2-1 on April 11, 2012.
Goalscorers
- 48′H. HangRakvere Tarvas
- 51′H. HangRakvere Tarvas
- 67′Ola Lennart HagbergFCI Levadia II
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 6 matches in all competitions, Rakvere Tarvas have 2 wins, 2 draws and 2 defeats; FCI Levadia II have 5, 4 and 6.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2012 | FCI Tallinn(away) | 1-2 | Esiliiga A |
| Apr 1, 2012 | Tartu SK 10(home) | 1-3 | Esiliiga A |
| Mar 28, 2012 | Lootus(away) | 2-0 | Esiliiga A |
| Mar 25, 2012 | Flora II(away) | 1-1 | Esiliiga A |
| Mar 18, 2012 | Puuma(home) | 1-1 | Esiliiga A |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2012 | Flora II(home) | 0-0 | Esiliiga A |
| Apr 1, 2012 | Puuma(away) | 1-2 | Esiliiga A |
| Mar 28, 2012 | Pärnu(home) | 1-2 | Esiliiga A |
| Mar 25, 2012 | Tammeka II(away) | 1-3 | Esiliiga A |
| Mar 18, 2012 | Kiviõli Irbis(home) | 2-2 | Esiliiga A |
How many goals should we expect?
Rakvere Tarvas score 1.3 and concede 1.3 goals per match over their last 6; FCI Levadia II score 1.8 and concede 1.9.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rakvere Tarvas | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1 | 5/6 | 3/6 |
| FCI Levadia II | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1 | 13/15 | 12/15 |
Over the last 6 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | FCI Levadia II | 25 | 11 | 1 | 13 | 47 | 48 | 34 |
| 9 | FCI Levadia II | 16 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 26 | 33 | 15 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy