Santos DE Guapiles vs Guadalupe FC: result 1-0 and analysis
Primera DivisiónTorneo de Invierno - 5Kick-off on July 31, 2016 at 09:30 PM (UTC)Estadio Ebal Rodríguez Aguilar, Guápiles
Full time
What was the result of Santos DE Guapiles vs Guadalupe FC?
Santos DE Guapiles won 1-0 on July 31, 2016.
Goalscorers
- 67′O. RodríguezSantos DE Guapiles
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 3 matches in all competitions, Santos DE Guapiles have 0 wins, 3 draws and 0 defeats; Guadalupe FC have 0, 1 and 3.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2016 | CS Herediano(home) | 2-2 | Primera División |
| Jul 21, 2016 | San Carlos(away) | 1-1 | Primera División |
| Jul 17, 2016 | LD Alajuelense(home) | 0-0 | Primera División |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2016 | AD Carmelita(away) | 0-2 | Primera División |
| Jul 24, 2016 | Perez Zeledon(away) | 1-3 | Primera División |
| Jul 20, 2016 | CS Herediano(away) | 2-3 | Primera División |
| Jul 17, 2016 | Municipal Liberia(home) | 1-1 | Primera División |
How many goals should we expect?
Santos DE Guapiles score 1.0 and concede 1.0 goals per match over their last 3; Guadalupe FC score 1.0 and concede 2.3.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santos DE Guapiles | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1 | 2/3 | 1/3 |
| Guadalupe FC | 1.0 | 2.3 | 0 | 3/4 | 2/4 |
Over the last 3 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Guadalupe FC | 18 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 17 | 32 | 13 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy