Spartaks Jurmala vs Jelgava: result 2-0 and analysis
VirsligaRegular Season - 26Kick-off on August 31, 2012 at 03:00 PM (UTC)Slokas Stadiona
Full time
What was the result of Spartaks Jurmala vs Jelgava?
Spartaks Jurmala won 2-0 on August 31, 2012.
Goalscorers
- 30′D. CortésSpartaks Jurmala
- 38′D. CortésSpartaks Jurmala
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Spartaks Jurmala have 3 wins, 5 draws and 7 defeats; Jelgava have 3, 4 and 8.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2012 | Metta / LU(home) | 3-4 | Virsliga |
| Aug 22, 2012 | Daugava Rīga(away) | 5-2 | Virsliga |
| Aug 18, 2012 | Gulbene 2005(home) | 2-2 | Virsliga |
| Aug 11, 2012 | Liepājas Metalurgs(away) | 1-2 | Virsliga |
| Aug 4, 2012 | Skonto(home) | 0-1 | Virsliga |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2012 | FK Ventspils(away) | 0-0 | Virsliga |
| Aug 22, 2012 | FC Jūrmala(home) | 1-3 | Virsliga |
| Aug 18, 2012 | Daugavpils / Progress(home) | 0-2 | Virsliga |
| Aug 11, 2012 | Metta / LU(away) | 3-1 | Virsliga |
| Aug 8, 2012 | Skonto(home) | 1-2 | Virsliga |
What does the head-to-head say?
Across the last 2 meetings: 1 Spartaks Jurmala win(s), 0 draw(s), 1 Jelgava win(s).
| Date | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2012 | Jelgava 3-2 Spartaks Jurmala | Virsliga |
| May 2, 2012 | Jelgava 1-3 Spartaks Jurmala | Virsliga |
Last archived meeting: Jelgava vs Spartaks Jurmala on Jul 1, 2012
How many goals should we expect?
Spartaks Jurmala score 1.9 and concede 1.9 goals per match over their last 15; Jelgava score 0.9 and concede 1.6.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spartaks Jurmala | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2 | 11/15 | 12/15 |
| Jelgava | 0.9 | 1.6 | 3 | 8/15 | 7/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy