Ull/Kisa vs Kongsvinger: result 2-2 and analysis
1. DivisionRegular Season - 12Kick-off on June 12, 2016 at 04:00 PM (UTC)Jessheim Stadion, Jessheim
Full time
What was the result of Ull/Kisa vs Kongsvinger?
Ull/Kisa and Kongsvinger drew 2-2 on June 12, 2016.
Goalscorers
- 44′T. BraatenUll/Kisa
- 55′O. Kristian LangåsUll/Kisa
- 78′Émile Noé DadjoKongsvinger
- 80′Adrian Lillebekk OvlienKongsvinger
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 11 matches in all competitions, Ull/Kisa have 1 wins, 4 draws and 6 defeats; Kongsvinger have 5, 2 and 4.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2016 | KFUM Oslo(away) | 0-0 | 1. Division |
| May 29, 2016 | jerv(home) | 1-1 | 1. Division |
| May 22, 2016 | hodd(away) | 0-1 | 1. Division |
| May 16, 2016 | Mjondalen(home) | 5-1 | 1. Division |
| May 12, 2016 | Asane(away) | 2-4 | 1. Division |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2016 | Sandefjord(home) | 1-0 | 1. Division |
| May 29, 2016 | Levanger(away) | 2-2 | 1. Division |
| May 22, 2016 | Sandnes ULF(home) | 1-2 | 1. Division |
| May 16, 2016 | Strommen(away) | 1-2 | 1. Division |
| May 12, 2016 | Kristiansund BK(home) | 1-3 | 1. Division |
How many goals should we expect?
Ull/Kisa score 1.3 and concede 1.6 goals per match over their last 11; Kongsvinger score 1.9 and concede 1.5.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ull/Kisa | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1 | 9/11 | 6/11 |
| Kongsvinger | 1.9 | 1.5 | 4 | 6/11 | 9/11 |
Over the last 11 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Kongsvinger | 18 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 48 | 28 | 39 |
| 2 | Kongsvinger | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 26 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy