Vasalund vs Piteå: result 4-0 and analysis
Ettan - NorraRegular Season - 11Kick-off on July 13, 2016 at 05:00 PM (UTC)Skytteholms IP, Solna
Full time
What was the result of Vasalund vs Piteå?
Vasalund won 4-0 on July 13, 2016.
Goalscorers
- 17′E. BulutVasalund
- 59′E. BulutVasalund
- 78′U. IkeVasalund
- 90′A. BjörnströmVasalund
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 12 matches in all competitions, Vasalund have 6 wins, 5 draws and 1 defeats; Piteå have 3, 2 and 7.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2016 | IF Brommapojkarna(home) | 1-1 | Ettan - Norra |
| Jul 3, 2016 | Sleipner(away) | 3-2 | Ettan - Norra |
| Jun 19, 2016 | Umea FF(home) | 2-1 | Ettan - Norra |
| Jun 11, 2016 | Vasteras SK FK(away) | 1-1 | Ettan - Norra |
| Jun 4, 2016 | Forward(away) | 0-2 | Ettan - Norra |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2016 | Carlstad United(home) | 1-3 | Ettan - Norra |
| Jul 6, 2016 | IFK Luleå(home) | 2-3 | Ettan - Norra |
| Jun 19, 2016 | Vasteras SK FK(home) | 1-1 | Ettan - Norra |
| Jun 14, 2016 | Umeå FC(away) | 1-3 | Ettan - Norra |
| Jun 5, 2016 | Nyköping(away) | 3-2 | Ettan - Norra |
How many goals should we expect?
Vasalund score 1.7 and concede 0.8 goals per match over their last 12; Piteå score 1.3 and concede 2.0.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasalund | 1.7 | 0.8 | 4 | 7/12 | 5/12 |
| Piteå | 1.3 | 2.0 | 0 | 10/12 | 8/12 |
Over the last 12 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
Vasalund sit 10th in Ettan - Norra (23 points from 18 matches) and Piteå sit 15th (12 points from 18 matches).
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Vasalund | 18 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 28 | 35 | 23 |
| 15 | Piteå | 18 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 18 | 36 | 12 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy