Zalaegerszegi TE vs Budafoki LC: result 2-2 and analysis
NB IIRegular Season - 10Kick-off on September 24, 2017 at 04:00 PM (UTC)ZTE-Aréna, Zalaegerszeg
Full time
What was the result of Zalaegerszegi TE vs Budafoki LC?
Zalaegerszegi TE and Budafoki LC drew 2-2 on September 24, 2017.
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Zalaegerszegi TE have 8 wins, 4 draws and 3 defeats; Budafoki LC have 5, 3 and 7.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2017 | Gárdony(away) | 3-0 | Magyar Kupa |
| Sep 17, 2017 | Szolnoki MAV FC(away) | 0-2 | NB II |
| Sep 10, 2017 | VAC(home) | 0-0 | NB II |
| Sep 2, 2017 | Bekescsaba 1912(away) | 3-0 | NB II |
| Aug 27, 2017 | Cegledi VSE(home) | 2-0 | NB II |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2017 | DEAC(away) | 4-0 | Magyar Kupa |
| Sep 17, 2017 | Gyori ETO FC(home) | 1-2 | NB II |
| Sep 10, 2017 | MTE 1904(away) | 0-0 | NB II |
| Sep 2, 2017 | Soproni VSE(home) | 1-0 | NB II |
| Aug 27, 2017 | MTK Budapest(away) | 1-4 | NB II |
How many goals should we expect?
Zalaegerszegi TE score 1.5 and concede 1.0 goals per match over their last 15; Budafoki LC score 1.2 and concede 1.7.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zalaegerszegi TE | 1.5 | 1.0 | 8 | 4/15 | 7/15 |
| Budafoki LC | 1.2 | 1.7 | 7 | 6/15 | 7/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Budafoki LC | 30 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 33 | 49 | 29 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy