FA 2000 vs Hillerød: result 3-1 and analysis
2. DivisionGroup 1 - 8Kick-off on September 14, 2019 at 11:45 AM (UTC)Frederiksberg IP, Frederiksberg
Full time
What was the result of FA 2000 vs Hillerød?
FA 2000 won 3-1 on September 14, 2019.
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, FA 2000 have 6 wins, 3 draws and 6 defeats; Hillerød have 8, 1 and 6.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2019 | HIK(home) | 1-3 | 2. Division |
| Sep 1, 2019 | Holbæk B&I(away) | 0-4 | 2. Division |
| Aug 24, 2019 | Slagelse B&I(home) | 5-3 | 2. Division |
| Aug 21, 2019 | Avarta(away) | 0-1 | 2. Division |
| Aug 17, 2019 | Vanløse(home) | 1-3 | 2. Division |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2019 | Vanløse(home) | 0-4 | 2. Division |
| Sep 3, 2019 | Naestved(home) | 1-0 | DBU Pokalen |
| Aug 31, 2019 | Slagelse B&I(home) | 3-1 | 2. Division |
| Aug 24, 2019 | Brønshøj(away) | 0-2 | 2. Division |
| Aug 21, 2019 | FC Helsingor(home) | 1-2 | 2. Division |
What does the head-to-head say?
Across the last 2 meetings: 0 FA 2000 win(s), 0 draw(s), 2 Hillerød win(s).
| Date | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2016 | Hillerød 3-1 FA 2000 | Denmark Series - Group 1 |
| Sep 5, 2015 | FA 2000 1-4 Hillerød | Denmark Series - Group 1 |
How many goals should we expect?
FA 2000 score 2.0 and concede 1.9 goals per match over their last 15; Hillerød score 1.7 and concede 1.5.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA 2000 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2 | 10/15 | 11/15 |
| Hillerød | 1.7 | 1.5 | 4 | 8/15 | 10/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | FA 2000 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 3 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy