Antwerp vs Tubize: result 1-1 and analysis
Challenger Pro LeagueClosing - 5Kick-off on December 11, 2016 at 03:00 PM (UTC)Bosuilstadion, Deurne
Full time
What was the result of Antwerp vs Tubize?
Antwerp and Tubize drew 1-1 on December 11, 2016.
Goalscorers
- 9′Mégan LaurentTubize
- 75′F. CamusAntwerp
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Antwerp have 5 wins, 7 draws and 3 defeats; Tubize have 6, 2 and 7.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2016 | Lierse(away) | 2-2 | Challenger Pro League |
| Nov 26, 2016 | Union St. Gilloise(home) | 2-0 | Challenger Pro League |
| Nov 18, 2016 | OH Leuven(away) | 0-0 | Challenger Pro League |
| Nov 13, 2016 | Cercle Brugge(home) | 0-0 | Challenger Pro League |
| Nov 6, 2016 | Roeselare(away) | 1-2 | Challenger Pro League |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2016 | OH Leuven(home) | 0-2 | Challenger Pro League |
| Nov 26, 2016 | Lommel United(away) | 2-1 | Challenger Pro League |
| Nov 20, 2016 | Lierse(home) | 0-3 | Challenger Pro League |
| Nov 12, 2016 | Roeselare(away) | 1-1 | Challenger Pro League |
| Nov 6, 2016 | Cercle Brugge(home) | 4-1 | Challenger Pro League |
What does the head-to-head say?
Across the last 2 meetings: 1 Antwerp win(s), 1 draw(s), 0 Tubize win(s).
| Date | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2016 | Antwerp 2-0 Tubize | Challenger Pro League |
| Sep 25, 2016 | Tubize 2-2 Antwerp | Challenger Pro League |
How many goals should we expect?
Antwerp score 1.4 and concede 1.0 goals per match over their last 15; Tubize score 1.5 and concede 1.7.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antwerp | 1.4 | 1.0 | 5 | 9/15 | 7/15 |
| Tubize | 1.5 | 1.7 | 2 | 8/15 | 8/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy