Brattvåg vs Sandnes ULF: result 2-5 and analysis
2. Division - Group 1Group 1 - 6Kick-off on May 11, 2025 at 11:00 AM (UTC)Brattvåg kunstgress, Brattvåg
Full time
What was the result of Brattvåg vs Sandnes ULF?
Sandnes ULF won 2-5 on May 11, 2025.
Goalscorers
- 25′A. TveitenBrattvåg
- 30′G. ØregaardSandnes ULF
- 49′Å. BrusethSandnes ULF
- 50′O. SundgotSandnes ULF
- 59′572744Brattvåg
- 73′O. SundgotSandnes ULF (pen.)
- 79′S. SaugestadSandnes ULF
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Brattvåg have 6 wins, 1 draws and 8 defeats; Sandnes ULF have 6, 4 and 5.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2025 | Lysekloster(away) | 2-1 | 2. Division - Group 1 |
| Apr 27, 2025 | jerv(home) | 2-3 | 2. Division - Group 1 |
| Apr 19, 2025 | Træff(away) | 0-1 | 2. Division - Group 1 |
| Apr 13, 2025 | hodd(home) | 1-1 | NM Cupen |
| Apr 7, 2025 | Brann II(away) | 3-4 | 2. Division - Group 1 |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2025 | Træff(home) | 1-1 | 2. Division - Group 1 |
| Apr 28, 2025 | Brann II(away) | 1-2 | 2. Division - Group 1 |
| Apr 21, 2025 | Pors Grenland(home) | 2-1 | 2. Division - Group 1 |
| Apr 13, 2025 | Vidar(away) | 0-2 | NM Cupen |
| Apr 5, 2025 | Arendal(away) | 3-3 | 2. Division - Group 1 |
How many goals should we expect?
Brattvåg score 2.0 and concede 2.1 goals per match over their last 15; Sandnes ULF score 2.1 and concede 1.9.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brattvåg | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2 | 12/15 | 12/15 |
| Sandnes ULF | 2.1 | 1.9 | 2 | 12/15 | 13/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Brattvåg | 16 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 16 | 32 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy