FC jazz vs GrIFK: result 3-2 and analysis
YkkönenRegular Season - 9Kick-off on August 7, 2016 at 03:30 PM (UTC)Porin Stadion, Pori
Full time
What was the result of FC jazz vs GrIFK?
FC jazz won 3-2 on August 7, 2016.
Goalscorers
- 6′Petter MeyerGrIFK
- 37′S. MäkeläFC jazz
- 45′C. MatroneGrIFK
- 69′Niko PereraFC jazz (o.g.)
- 80′Dani SanchezFC jazz
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, FC jazz have 1 wins, 3 draws and 11 defeats; GrIFK have 5, 3 and 7.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2016 | JJK(away) | 0-2 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 29, 2016 | Turku PS(home) | 0-4 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 16, 2016 | Kooteepee(away) | 0-1 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 9, 2016 | AC Oulu(home) | 2-2 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 3, 2016 | EIF(home) | 1-3 | Ykkönen |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2016 | Haka(away) | 0-3 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 24, 2016 | EIF(home) | 3-2 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 17, 2016 | Turku PS(away) | 0-2 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 10, 2016 | JJK(home) | 0-1 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 2, 2016 | Kooteepee(away) | 2-1 | Ykkönen |
What does the head-to-head say?
Across the last 1 meetings: 0 FC jazz win(s), 1 draw(s), 0 GrIFK win(s).
| Date | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2016 | GrIFK 1-1 FC jazz | Ykkönen |
How many goals should we expect?
FC jazz score 1.3 and concede 2.7 goals per match over their last 15; GrIFK score 0.9 and concede 1.6.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC jazz | 1.3 | 2.7 | 0 | 10/15 | 10/15 |
| GrIFK | 0.9 | 1.6 | 2 | 7/15 | 8/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | FC jazz | 21 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 30 | 29 | 30 |
| 7 | FC jazz | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 14 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy