Malaysia U17 vs Guam U17: prediction and stats
AFC U17 Asian CupGroup Stage - 4Kick-off on November 17, 2026 at 11:00 AM (UTC)
The Footlab AI model makes Malaysia U17 the favourite at 82%, against 10% for a draw and 8% for Guam U17. The most likely score is 3-1.
Footlab AI's cards found the right outcome in 54.2% of the 3,019 matches already evaluated, against 33.3% for random guessing. See the measured accuracy
Probabilities recomputed on Oct 22, 2026. The full match card is recomputed continuously until kick-off.
Who will win Malaysia U17 vs Guam U17?
Malaysia U17 starts as the favourite with a 271-point Elo edge (1,498 vs 1,227).
Computed by the Footlab AI model from our own data only, with no AI analysis.
Probable lineup for Malaysia U17 vs Guam U17
Computed by Footlab AI from our own data only: recent lineups, squads and known absences. It does not take the press or last-minute absences into account.
Malaysia U17
Not enough data to predict the Malaysia U17 lineup.
Guam U17
Not enough data to predict the Guam U17 lineup.
Computed on October 22, 2026 at 10:59 AM (UTC).
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 10 matches in all competitions, Malaysia U17 have 5 wins, 1 draw and 4 defeats; Guam U17 have 0, 0 and 8.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2025 | Vietnam U17(away) | 0-4 | AFC U17 Asian Cup |
| Nov 28, 2025 | Singapore U17(home) | 2-1 | AFC U17 Asian Cup |
| Nov 26, 2025 | Macau U17(away) | 5-0 | AFC U17 Asian Cup |
| Nov 24, 2025 | Hong Kong U17(home) | 1-0 | AFC U17 Asian Cup |
| Nov 22, 2025 | N. Mariana Islands U17(home) | 13-0 | AFC U17 Asian Cup |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2025 | Pakistan U17(home) | 0-11 | AFC U17 Asian Cup |
| Nov 28, 2025 | Cambodia U17(away) | 1-5 | AFC U17 Asian Cup |
| Nov 26, 2025 | Kyrgyzstan U17(home) | 0-9 | AFC U17 Asian Cup |
| Nov 24, 2025 | Yemen U17(away) | 0-10 | AFC U17 Asian Cup |
| Nov 22, 2025 | Laos U17(away) | 0-8 | AFC U17 Asian Cup |
How many goals should we expect?
Malaysia U17 score 2.5 and concede 1.7 goals per match over their last 10; Guam U17 score 0.1 and concede 13.5. The model gives a 89% probability of over 2.5 goals and 72% for both teams to score.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malaysia U17 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 3 | 3/10 | 8/10 |
| Guam U17 | 0.1 | 13.5 | 0 | 1/8 | 8/8 |
Over the last 10 matches in all competitions.
A question about Malaysia U17 vs Guam U17?
Ask Footlab AI: lineups, absences, player form, stats, how the match could unfold.
Sign-in required. No odds displayed, no affiliation: the method is published and the accuracy is measured.
How does Footlab AI compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. When bookmakers publish odds for the match, their consensus is built into the calculation: that is what proved most accurate on past matches. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy
Frequently asked questions
- Who is the favourite for Malaysia U17 vs Guam U17?
- The Footlab AI model makes Malaysia U17 the favourite at 82%, against 10% for a draw and 8% for Guam U17.
- Where and when is Malaysia U17 vs Guam U17 played?
- Malaysia U17 vs Guam U17 is played on November 17, 2026 at 11:00 AM (UTC), in the AFC U17 Asian Cup.
- Will there be over 2.5 goals?
- The Footlab AI model gives a 89% probability of at least three goals in this match.
- How reliable is this prediction?
- Footlab AI's cards found the right outcome (home win, draw or away win) in 54.2% of the matches already evaluated, against 33.3% for random guessing, a level comparable with the bookmakers' favourite. The comparison with bookmakers and the breakdown by competition and Elo gap are published on the accuracy page.