MP vs FC jazz: result 3-2 and analysis
YkkönenRegular Season - 9Kick-off on August 9, 2015 at 03:30 PM (UTC)Mikkelin Urheilupuisto, Mikkeli
Full time
What was the result of MP vs FC jazz?
MP won 3-2 on August 9, 2015.
Goalscorers
- 15′Ikka SantahuhtaFC jazz
- 41′J. TuominenMP
- 49′J. TuominenMP
- 66′Dimitri KlimovMP
- 81′S. MäkeläFC jazz
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, MP have 3 wins, 2 draws and 10 defeats; FC jazz have 4, 3 and 8.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2015 | Haka(home) | 3-4 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 26, 2015 | PK-35 Vantaa(away) | 1-2 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 18, 2015 | AC Oulu(away) | 0-1 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 12, 2015 | Turku PS(home) | 0-2 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 5, 2015 | VIFK(home) | 1-1 | Ykkönen |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2015 | JJK(away) | 2-1 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 24, 2015 | VIFK(home) | 5-1 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 19, 2015 | Haka(away) | 1-2 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 11, 2015 | PK-35 Vantaa(home) | 2-0 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 4, 2015 | AC Oulu(away) | 0-1 | Ykkönen |
What does the head-to-head say?
Across the last 1 meetings: 1 MP win(s), 0 draw(s), 0 FC jazz win(s).
| Date | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2015 | FC jazz 1-5 MP | Ykkönen |
How many goals should we expect?
MP score 1.2 and concede 1.9 goals per match over their last 15; FC jazz score 1.4 and concede 1.9.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1 | 7/15 | 8/15 |
| FC jazz | 1.4 | 1.9 | 2 | 10/15 | 10/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | FC jazz | 21 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 30 | 29 | 30 |
| 7 | FC jazz | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 14 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy