Musa vs ÅIFK: result 3-2 and analysis
Kakkonen - Lohko CRegular Season - 11Kick-off on August 16, 2013 at 03:30 PM (UTC)Porin Stadion, Pori
Full time
What was the result of Musa vs ÅIFK?
Musa won 3-2 on August 16, 2013.
Goalscorers
- 35′Sami RantalaMusa
- 56′H. AftabÅIFK
- 59′Marcelo Goncalves de OliveiraMusa
- 71′T. TuuriMusa
- 79′H. AftabÅIFK
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Musa have 2 wins, 1 draws and 12 defeats; ÅIFK have 6, 2 and 7.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2013 | Hämeenlinna(away) | 3-5 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Aug 7, 2013 | P-Iirot(home) | 0-4 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Aug 4, 2013 | Sporting Kristina(away) | 0-2 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Jul 27, 2013 | MaPS(home) | 2-3 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Jul 22, 2013 | TPV(away) | 1-3 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2013 | Kraft(home) | 3-2 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Aug 7, 2013 | Hämeenlinna(home) | 0-0 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Aug 3, 2013 | P-Iirot(away) | 2-3 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Jul 28, 2013 | TPV(home) | 4-0 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Jul 22, 2013 | Härmä(away) | 4-0 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
What does the head-to-head say?
Across the last 2 meetings: 0 Musa win(s), 1 draw(s), 1 ÅIFK win(s).
| Date | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2013 | Musa 2-2 ÅIFK | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Apr 21, 2013 | ÅIFK 4-0 Musa | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
How many goals should we expect?
Musa score 1.1 and concede 3.2 goals per match over their last 15; ÅIFK score 1.9 and concede 1.5.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Musa | 1.1 | 3.2 | 1 | 8/15 | 13/15 |
| ÅIFK | 1.9 | 1.5 | 4 | 8/15 | 9/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy