MyPa vs Lahti: result 3-1 and analysis
VeikkausliigaRegular Season - 20Kick-off on August 4, 2012 at 03:30 PM (UTC)Kymenlaakson Sähkö Stadion, Myllykoski
Full time
What was the result of MyPa vs Lahti?
MyPa won 3-1 on August 4, 2012.
Goalscorers
- 8′Pekka SihvolaMyPa
- 70′Pekka SihvolaMyPa
- 81′Olli TynkkynenMyPa (o.g.)
- 90′Drilon ShalaLahti
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, MyPa have 4 wins, 5 draws and 6 defeats; Lahti have 6, 1 and 8.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2012 | VPS(away) | 0-2 | Veikkausliiga |
| Jul 22, 2012 | Honka(home) | 0-0 | Veikkausliiga |
| Jul 15, 2012 | Haka(away) | 1-3 | Veikkausliiga |
| Jul 8, 2012 | KuPS(home) | 1-1 | Veikkausliiga |
| Jul 2, 2012 | HJK Helsinki(away) | 1-1 | Veikkausliiga |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2012 | FF Jaro(home) | 0-2 | Veikkausliiga |
| Jul 22, 2012 | Turku PS(away) | 0-4 | Veikkausliiga |
| Jul 16, 2012 | Mariehamn(home) | 2-0 | Veikkausliiga |
| Jul 8, 2012 | JJK(away) | 1-3 | Veikkausliiga |
| Jul 2, 2012 | Inter Turku(home) | 4-3 | Veikkausliiga |
What does the head-to-head say?
Across the last 1 meetings: 0 MyPa win(s), 1 draw(s), 0 Lahti win(s).
| Date | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2012 | Lahti 0-0 MyPa | Veikkausliiga |
How many goals should we expect?
MyPa score 1.0 and concede 0.9 goals per match over their last 15; Lahti score 1.1 and concede 1.5.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MyPa | 1.0 | 0.9 | 6 | 5/15 | 5/15 |
| Lahti | 1.1 | 1.5 | 5 | 4/15 | 5/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Lahti | 21 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 25 | 19 | 29 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy