Qabala vs FSV Mainz 05: result 2-3 and analysis
UEFA Europa LeagueGroup Stage - 2Kick-off on September 29, 2016 at 03:00 PM (UTC)Şəhər stadionu, Qəbələ
Full time
What was the result of Qabala vs FSV Mainz 05?
FSV Mainz 05 won 2-3 on September 29, 2016.
Goalscorers
- 41′Y. MutoFSV Mainz 05
- 57′Ruslan QurbanovQabala (pen.)
- 62′S. ZenjovQabala
- 68′J. CórdobaFSV Mainz 05
- 78′L. ÖztunalıFSV Mainz 05
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Qabala have 10 wins, 2 draws and 3 defeats; FSV Mainz 05 have 4, 7 and 4.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2016 | Zira(away) | 2-0 | Premyer Liqa |
| Sep 22, 2016 | Sumqayıt(home) | 2-0 | Premyer Liqa |
| Sep 19, 2016 | Şüvəlan(home) | 3-0 | Premyer Liqa |
| Sep 15, 2016 | Anderlecht(away) | 1-3 | UEFA Europa League |
| Sep 10, 2016 | Neftchi Baku(away) | 8-0 | Premyer Liqa |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2016 | Bayer Leverkusen(home) | 2-3 | Bundesliga |
| Sep 21, 2016 | Werder Bremen(away) | 2-1 | Bundesliga |
| Sep 18, 2016 | FC Augsburg(away) | 3-1 | Bundesliga |
| Sep 15, 2016 | Saint Etienne(home) | 1-1 | UEFA Europa League |
| Sep 11, 2016 | 1899 Hoffenheim(home) | 4-4 | Bundesliga |
How many goals should we expect?
Qabala score 2.2 and concede 0.7 goals per match over their last 15; FSV Mainz 05 score 2.1 and concede 1.9.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qabala | 2.2 | 0.7 | 8 | 6/15 | 7/15 |
| FSV Mainz 05 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 2 | 13/15 | 10/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy