Ras Al Khaima vs Al Shaab: result 4-4 and analysis
Division 1Regular Season - 14Kick-off on March 4, 2017 at 01:30 PM (UTC)Ras Al-Khaima Stadium, Ras al-Khaimah
Full time
What was the result of Ras Al Khaima vs Al Shaab?
Ras Al Khaima and Al Shaab drew 4-4 on March 4, 2017.
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Ras Al Khaima have 2 wins, 3 draws and 10 defeats; Al Shaab have 4, 7 and 4.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2017 | Dibba Al Hisn(away) | 1-3 | Division 1 |
| Feb 18, 2017 | Khorfakkan(home) | 2-2 | Division 1 |
| Feb 3, 2017 | Al Urooba(home) | 0-3 | Division 1 |
| Jan 27, 2017 | Masfut(away) | 2-1 | Division 1 |
| Jan 21, 2017 | Dubai(home) | 1-2 | Division 1 |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2017 | Al Thaid(home) | 1-0 | Division 1 |
| Feb 18, 2017 | Al Hamriyah(away) | 2-0 | Division 1 |
| Feb 10, 2017 | Dubai(home) | 1-2 | Division 1 |
| Feb 3, 2017 | Dibba Al Hisn(home) | 2-2 | Division 1 |
| Jan 28, 2017 | Khorfakkan(away) | 2-3 | Division 1 |
What does the head-to-head say?
Across the last 3 meetings: 0 Ras Al Khaima win(s), 0 draw(s), 3 Al Shaab win(s).
| Date | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2016 | Al Shaab 3-1 Ras Al Khaima | Division 1 |
| Feb 20, 2015 | Ras Al Khaima 0-2 Al Shaab | Division 1 |
| Nov 15, 2014 | Al Shaab 2-0 Ras Al Khaima | Division 1 |
Last archived meeting: Al Shaab vs Ras Al Khaima on Nov 26, 2016
How many goals should we expect?
Ras Al Khaima score 1.1 and concede 2.1 goals per match over their last 15; Al Shaab score 1.5 and concede 1.6.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ras Al Khaima | 1.1 | 2.1 | 0 | 12/15 | 11/15 |
| Al Shaab | 1.5 | 1.6 | 2 | 11/15 | 7/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy