Vålerenga II vs Ull/Kisa: result 1-6 and analysis
2. Division - Group 2Group 2 - 7Kick-off on May 23, 2022 at 03:00 PM (UTC)Intility Arena, Oslo
Full time
What was the result of Vålerenga II vs Ull/Kisa?
Ull/Kisa won 1-6 on May 23, 2022.
Goalscorers
- 10′J. EngVålerenga II
- 23′S. SørløkkUll/Kisa
- 28′M. EmilsenUll/Kisa (o.g.)
- 45′S. SørløkkUll/Kisa
- 55′S. JenssenUll/Kisa
- 74′O. SundgotUll/Kisa
- 75′J. KvernstuenUll/Kisa
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Vålerenga II have 5 wins, 2 draws and 8 defeats; Ull/Kisa have 4, 4 and 7.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2022 | Eidsvold(away) | 0-2 | 2. Division - Group 2 |
| May 9, 2022 | Frigg(home) | 4-1 | 2. Division - Group 2 |
| Apr 30, 2022 | hodd(away) | 0-3 | 2. Division - Group 2 |
| Apr 25, 2022 | Alta(home) | 7-2 | 2. Division - Group 2 |
| Apr 19, 2022 | Levanger(away) | 1-1 | 2. Division - Group 2 |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2022 | Skjetten(away) | 3-0 | NM Cupen |
| May 14, 2022 | Tromsdalen Uil(home) | 2-2 | 2. Division - Group 2 |
| May 7, 2022 | Gjøvik-Lyn(away) | 0-4 | 2. Division - Group 2 |
| Apr 30, 2022 | Kjelsås(home) | 1-1 | 2. Division - Group 2 |
| Apr 18, 2022 | Frigg(away) | 3-1 | 2. Division - Group 2 |
How many goals should we expect?
Vålerenga II score 1.7 and concede 2.3 goals per match over their last 15; Ull/Kisa score 1.5 and concede 1.6.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vålerenga II | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1 | 9/15 | 10/15 |
| Ull/Kisa | 1.5 | 1.6 | 3 | 10/15 | 11/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Ull/Kisa | 16 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 21 | 54 | 10 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy