GrIFK vs EIF: result 3-2 and analysis
YkkönenRegular Season - 8Kick-off on July 24, 2016 at 03:30 PM (UTC)Kauniaisten Keskuskenttä, Grankulla
Full time
What was the result of GrIFK vs EIF?
GrIFK won 3-2 on July 24, 2016.
Goalscorers
- 12′D. LanghoffGrIFK
- 69′Faton SeferiGrIFK
- 71′B. KindaEIF
- 90′Lamin JaitehEIF
- 90′Faton SeferiGrIFK
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, GrIFK have 6 wins, 3 draws and 6 defeats; EIF have 7, 1 and 7.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2016 | Turku PS(away) | 0-2 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 10, 2016 | JJK(home) | 0-1 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 2, 2016 | Kooteepee(away) | 2-1 | Ykkönen |
| Jun 28, 2016 | KPV Kokkola(home) | 1-0 | Ykkönen |
| Jun 19, 2016 | AC Oulu(away) | 1-3 | Ykkönen |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2016 | Haka(home) | 2-1 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 11, 2016 | Kooteepee(home) | 3-2 | Ykkönen |
| Jul 3, 2016 | FC jazz(away) | 3-1 | Ykkönen |
| Jun 28, 2016 | JJK(home) | 1-2 | Ykkönen |
| Jun 19, 2016 | KPV Kokkola(away) | 2-3 | Ykkönen |
What does the head-to-head say?
Across the last 5 meetings: 1 GrIFK win(s), 2 draw(s), 2 EIF win(s).
| Date | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2016 | EIF 3-0 GrIFK | Ykkönen |
| Aug 24, 2014 | GrIFK 0-1 EIF | Kakkonen - Lohko B |
| Jun 28, 2014 | EIF 3-3 GrIFK | Kakkonen - Lohko B |
| May 11, 2014 | GrIFK 3-0 EIF | Kakkonen - Lohko B |
| Sep 29, 2013 | EIF 3-3 GrIFK | Kakkonen - Lohko B |
How many goals should we expect?
GrIFK score 1.0 and concede 1.3 goals per match over their last 15; EIF score 1.6 and concede 1.7.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GrIFK | 1.0 | 1.3 | 3 | 7/15 | 7/15 |
| EIF | 1.6 | 1.7 | 2 | 9/15 | 10/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy