Jelgava II vs Tukums: result 3-1 and analysis
1. LigaRegular Season - 8Kick-off on June 17, 2012 at 02:00 PM (UTC)
Full time
What was the result of Jelgava II vs Tukums?
Jelgava II won 3-1 on June 17, 2012.
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 7 matches in all competitions, Jelgava II have 0 wins, 2 draws and 5 defeats; Tukums have 1, 0 and 6.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2012 | Valmiera / BSS(away) | 1-4 | 1. Liga |
| May 31, 2012 | Skonto II(home) | 1-1 | 1. Liga |
| May 27, 2012 | Ilukstes NSS(away) | 0-7 | 1. Liga |
| May 19, 2012 | Spartaks II(home) | 6-6 | 1. Liga |
| May 13, 2012 | Ventspils II(away) | 0-2 | 1. Liga |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2012 | Rīgas FS(home) | 0-5 | 1. Liga |
| Jun 2, 2012 | Rēzekne FA(away) | 0-3 | 1. Liga |
| May 26, 2012 | Auda(home) | 1-3 | 1. Liga |
| May 19, 2012 | BFC Daugavpils(away) | 0-3 | 1. Liga |
| May 12, 2012 | 1625 Liepāja(home) | 1-3 | 1. Liga |
How many goals should we expect?
Jelgava II score 1.3 and concede 3.3 goals per match over their last 7; Tukums score 0.7 and concede 2.9.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelgava II | 1.3 | 3.3 | 0 | 4/7 | 4/7 |
| Tukums | 0.7 | 2.9 | 0 | 4/7 | 7/7 |
Over the last 7 matches in all competitions.
A question about Jelgava II vs Tukums?
Ask Footlab AI: lineups, absences, player form, stats, how the match could unfold.
Sign-in required. No odds displayed, no affiliation: the method is published and the accuracy is measured.
How does Footlab AI compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. When bookmakers publish odds for the match, their consensus is built into the calculation: that is what proved most accurate on past matches. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy