MaPS vs TPV: result 1-0 and analysis
Kakkonen - Lohko CRegular Season - 21Kick-off on August 22, 2014 at 03:30 PM (UTC)Masku Taponketo nurmi, Masku
Full time
What was the result of MaPS vs TPV?
MaPS won 1-0 on August 22, 2014.
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, MaPS have 6 wins, 6 draws and 3 defeats; TPV have 8, 1 and 6.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2014 | Kerho 07 (SJK II)(home) | 2-1 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Aug 10, 2014 | VIFK(away) | 1-2 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Aug 7, 2014 | Kraft(away) | 3-0 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Aug 1, 2014 | ÅIFK(home) | 4-4 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Jul 25, 2014 | Hämeenlinna(home) | 1-1 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2014 | VIFK(away) | 1-2 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Aug 10, 2014 | Sporting Kristina(home) | 4-1 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Aug 6, 2014 | Hämeenlinna(home) | 1-4 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Aug 2, 2014 | Kerho 07 (SJK II)(away) | 1-4 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Jul 27, 2014 | Kraft(away) | 1-2 | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
What does the head-to-head say?
Across the last 5 meetings: 0 MaPS win(s), 3 draw(s), 2 TPV win(s).
| Date | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2014 | MaPS 2-2 TPV | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| May 10, 2014 | TPV 2-2 MaPS | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Oct 5, 2013 | MaPS 1-1 TPV | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Aug 7, 2013 | TPV 3-0 MaPS | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
| Jun 14, 2013 | MaPS 0-4 TPV | Kakkonen - Lohko C |
How many goals should we expect?
MaPS score 1.7 and concede 1.3 goals per match over their last 15; TPV score 1.9 and concede 1.7.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaPS | 1.7 | 1.3 | 4 | 10/15 | 10/15 |
| TPV | 1.9 | 1.7 | 4 | 9/15 | 13/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy