Match

Trakai II vs Panevėžys: result 1-2 and analysis

1 LygaRegular Season - 13Kick-off on June 20, 2017 at 05:00 PM (UTC)Trakų naujasis stadionas, Trakai

Trakai II
1-2
Panevėžys

Full time

What was the result of Trakai II vs Panevėžys?

Panevėžys won 1-2 on June 20, 2017.

What is the recent form of both teams?

Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, Trakai II have 6 wins, 2 draws and 7 defeats; Panevėžys have 6, 6 and 3.

The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.

Trakai II
DateOpponentScoreCompetition
Jun 16, 2017Pakruojis(away)2-11 Lyga
Jun 9, 2017Tauras(away)0-31 Lyga
May 30, 2017Džiugas Telšiai(away)0-11 Lyga
May 19, 2017Nevėžis(home)0-21 Lyga
May 11, 2017Vilniaus Vytis(home)1-11 Lyga
Panevėžys
DateOpponentScoreCompetition
Jun 16, 2017Tauras(home)2-01 Lyga
Jun 9, 2017Džiugas Telšiai(home)0-21 Lyga
Jun 4, 2017Vilniaus Vytis(home)1-11 Lyga
May 30, 2017Žalgiris II(away)2-21 Lyga
May 14, 2017Banga(home)0-11 Lyga

What does the head-to-head say?

Across the last 2 meetings: 0 Trakai II win(s), 0 draw(s), 2 Panevėžys win(s).

DateScoreCompetition
Oct 15, 2016Trakai II 1-4 Panevėžys1 Lyga
Jun 23, 2016Panevėžys 2-1 Trakai II1 Lyga

Last archived meeting: Trakai II vs Panevėžys on Oct 15, 2016

How many goals should we expect?

Trakai II score 1.3 and concede 1.6 goals per match over their last 15; Panevėžys score 1.9 and concede 1.0.

ClubGoals scored / matchGoals conceded / matchClean sheetsBoth teams scoredOver 2.5 goals
Trakai II1.31.647/157/15
Panevėžys1.91.049/157/15

Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.

How does Footlab compute this prediction?

The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy

Other matches in the same round

Next match: Trakai II and Panevėžys

Ready to know everything about football?