Tubize vs Antwerp: result 2-2 and analysis
Challenger Pro LeagueOpening - 7Kick-off on September 25, 2016 at 06:00 PM (UTC)Stade Leburton, Tubize
Full time
What was the result of Tubize vs Antwerp?
Tubize and Antwerp drew 2-2 on September 25, 2016.
Goalscorers
- 11′F. CamusAntwerp
- 45′A. TouréTubize
- 62′M. DialloTubize
- 80′B. VleminckxAntwerp
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 6 matches in all competitions, Tubize have 2 wins, 1 draws and 3 defeats; Antwerp have 1, 3 and 2.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2016 | Lierse(away) | 1-5 | Challenger Pro League |
| Sep 11, 2016 | OH Leuven(away) | 1-0 | Challenger Pro League |
| Sep 4, 2016 | Roeselare(home) | 4-1 | Challenger Pro League |
| Aug 21, 2016 | Cercle Brugge(away) | 1-4 | Challenger Pro League |
| Aug 14, 2016 | Lommel United(home) | 0-4 | Challenger Pro League |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2016 | OH Leuven(away) | 1-1 | Challenger Pro League |
| Sep 9, 2016 | Lierse(home) | 1-2 | Challenger Pro League |
| Sep 4, 2016 | Union St. Gilloise(away) | 1-1 | Challenger Pro League |
| Aug 19, 2016 | Lommel United(home) | 0-1 | Challenger Pro League |
| Aug 13, 2016 | Roeselare(home) | 1-0 | Challenger Pro League |
How many goals should we expect?
Tubize score 1.5 and concede 2.7 goals per match over their last 6; Antwerp score 0.8 and concede 1.0.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tubize | 1.5 | 2.7 | 1 | 4/6 | 5/6 |
| Antwerp | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1 | 4/6 | 1/6 |
Over the last 6 matches in all competitions.
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy