MP vs EIF: result 2-4 and analysis
YkkönenRegular Season - 14Kick-off on October 17, 2015 at 11:00 AM (UTC)Mikkelin Urheilupuisto, Mikkeli
Full time
What was the result of MP vs EIF?
EIF won 2-4 on October 17, 2015.
Goalscorers
- 39′B. KällmanEIF
- 59′M. SuhonenMP
- 62′Zacharias EkströmEIF
- 74′Lucas KaufmannEIF
- 75′B. KällmanEIF
- 77′Antti KuismalaMP
What is the recent form of both teams?
Over their last 15 matches in all competitions, MP have 2 wins, 1 draws and 12 defeats; EIF have 5, 4 and 6.
The competition is shown for every match: in pre-season, several of these games are friendlies.
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2015 | FC jazz(away) | 2-4 | Ykkönen |
| Oct 1, 2015 | Haka(away) | 0-2 | Ykkönen |
| Sep 24, 2015 | PK-35 Vantaa(home) | 0-4 | Ykkönen |
| Sep 20, 2015 | AC Oulu(home) | 2-0 | Ykkönen |
| Sep 12, 2015 | Turku PS(away) | 1-2 | Ykkönen |
| Date | Opponent | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2015 | AC Oulu(home) | 0-1 | Ykkönen |
| Oct 4, 2015 | PK-35 Vantaa(away) | 2-2 | Ykkönen |
| Sep 27, 2015 | PS Kemi Kings(home) | 1-0 | Ykkönen |
| Sep 19, 2015 | Turku PS(home) | 4-1 | Ykkönen |
| Sep 15, 2015 | JJK(away) | 1-5 | Ykkönen |
What does the head-to-head say?
Across the last 2 meetings: 0 MP win(s), 0 draw(s), 2 EIF win(s).
| Date | Score | Competition |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2015 | EIF 1-0 MP | Ykkönen |
| Jun 17, 2015 | MP 0-1 EIF | Ykkönen |
How many goals should we expect?
MP score 1.1 and concede 2.1 goals per match over their last 15; EIF score 1.1 and concede 1.4.
| Club | Goals scored / match | Goals conceded / match | Clean sheets | Both teams scored | Over 2.5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1 | 8/15 | 8/15 |
| EIF | 1.1 | 1.4 | 4 | 7/15 | 7/15 |
Over the last 15 matches in all competitions.
Where do both teams sit in the table?
| # | Club | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MP | 27 | 14 | 8 | 5 | 55 | 31 | 50 |
How does Footlab compute this prediction?
The model combines both teams' Elo ratings (anchored by competition pool), their recent form weighted by opponent strength, home advantage and a Poisson matrix for scorelines. Its accuracy is measured continuously on the predictions actually published. Methodology and measured accuracy